How to Paraphrase the Question in IELTS Writing Task 2 (Band 7 Guide)
Students often treat the first sentence like a photocopy job: keep as many prompt words as possible and hope Lexical Resource still looks strong. When we mark those scripts, the opening usually looks stiff — and LR does not move. Paraphrasing means restating the question in your own words while keeping the same meaning. Synonyms, word-form changes, and a new sentence shape help. Copying the prompt hurts LR; twisting the meaning hurts Task Response.
You mostly need this skill in the introduction (and sometimes a light echo in the conclusion). Related: introduction paragraph examples · band descriptors (LR).
Last updated: July 27, 2026
On this page (why it matters, four techniques, worked examples, common errors, FAQ)
Why paraphrasing matters
Paraphrasing is not decoration. Done well, it supports three criteria at once: Lexical Resource (range without recycling the prompt), Task Response (you clearly understood the question), and Coherence (the intro flows into a real thesis instead of a pasted stem).
Band 6 pattern: the first sentence keeps eight or more content words from the question.
Band 7 pattern: same meaning, with only a few identical content words — and then a clear lean or map.
One student stuck around overall 6 kept opening education essays with almost the full prompt, then bolted on I will discuss this topic. On the next timed draft we forced a rewrite of sentence 1 only: swap the main noun, change the clause shape, keep the opinion. LR did not jump overnight, but the intro stopped looking copied — and TR became easier to follow because the lean finally sat next to a clean restatement.
Four paraphrasing techniques
Synonym substitution
Useful swaps when you control the collocation: important → significant; children → young people / pupils; governments → authorities / the state; increase → rise / grow.
Caution: solve and resolve are not always interchangeable. If the synonym feels flashy but fuzzy, keep the everyday word you can use accurately.
Word-form change
- Global warming is increasing → rising global temperatures
- People are dependent on cars → car dependence has grown
- Many students fail → academic failure affects many students
This often sounds more natural than stacking three synonyms in one line.
Active ↔ passive
- Governments should invest more in public transport → Public transport should receive greater government investment
Use this when a synonym list is making the sentence stiff. Do not force passive into every opener.
Clause restructuring
- Some people think X, while others believe Y → X remains controversial, with critics arguing Y
Here you just need a new shape, not a rarer dictionary. Read it out loud — if it still sounds like the prompt with one word changed, restructure again.
Worked examples
Original: Some people believe that advertising targeted at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Band 6 (too close): Some people believe advertising aimed at children should be banned. I agree to a large extent.
Almost the same stem. The opinion is there, but the restatement barely works.
Band 7: Marketing campaigns directed at young consumers are widely criticised, and some argue they should be prohibited by law. I largely support such a ban because…
I include this pair because the gap is not “more advanced vocabulary.” It is fewer copied chunks, plus a lean that starts the argument immediately. Full openings by type: introduction examples.
Original: In many countries, the number of people studying abroad is increasing. Why is this? Is it positive or negative?
Band 7 sentence 1: International student mobility has expanded in numerous countries as more learners enrol in overseas universities.
Sentence 2 still has to map why and positive/negative. Paraphrase alone does not finish a two-part intro.
Common paraphrasing errors
Changing the topic is the expensive mistake — you answered a different question, and TR falls apart even if the English looks polished. Wrong near-synonyms also leak marks: economic vs economical, sensible vs sensitive. Over-paraphrasing names (IELTS, COVID-19) into obscure labels usually looks forced. And a memorised opener (In this day and age…) plus a copied question is a combination examiners recognise instantly.
What works instead: smaller changes, stay near the prompt, then practise the lean. Between timed essays, short mixed work — rewrite one thin intro, swap vague nouns, check the thesis — beats a “vocab week.” That habit matches Personalized Practice: Practices 1–15 mix drills; Practices 16–20 are timed essays; Practices 1–2 are free.
Questions students ask
Should I paraphrase every word?
No. Key topic words may repeat (education, technology). From the scripts I mark, the problem is copying whole phrases from the stem, not repeating a single necessary noun.
Can I paraphrase in body paragraphs?
Yes — especially in topic sentences and the conclusion. Varying the wording when you refer back to the issue helps cohesion without stuffing every line with a linker.
Does paraphrasing alone guarantee Band 7 LR?
No. I notice students who rewrite the intro beautifully and then pile collocation errors in the bodies. You still need accurate wording and error control across the full essay — paraphrase is one early signal, not the whole criterion.
After you check your score
Most free tools stop at another band estimate. EssayGradeWise adds criterion drills inside a 20-practice plan (TR, CC, LR, GRA) so you practise the weak spot — not another full essay at random.
- Free IELTS essay checker — no login for score-only
- Try Practices 1–2 free
EssayGradeWise is not affiliated with or endorsed by IELTS, IDP, or the British Council.